Interdental cleaning devices with active substances

shutterstock_87714310

This review of the efficacy of interdental cleaning devices (ICDs) used with active substances, as adjuncts to toothbrushing included 7 RCTs. However, none of the available studies was at low risk of bias and all were small. While the findings suggest s benefit from using ICDs with active substances the evidence is of very low certainty so additional high qiality well reported trials are needed.

[read the full story...]

Flossing: Before or after brushing?

shutterstock_20598889-Floss

This review comparing the clinical performance of flossing before or after toothbrushing included two small RCTs involving a total of 60 patients. The findings suggest no difference with the use of floss before or after toothbrushing however the quality of the evidence is limited.

[read the full story...]

Rubber bristles interdental cleaners as an adjunct to toothbrushing

shutterstock_87714310

This review of the efficacy of rubber bristles interdental cleaners (RBIC) as an adjunct to toothbrushing (TB) included 6 RCTs. The findings provide weak to very weak certainty evidence for the use of RBICs for gingivitis and plaque reduction.

[read the full story...]

Top Dental Elf Blogs Apr– Jun 2019

The Dental Elf brings you daily updates of evidence-based dentistry research

The Cochrane review of interdental cleaning devices, whether antibiotics are needed for dental implant placement and oral health programmes for people with intellectual difficulties were our most popular blogs of the spring.

[read the full story...]

Interdental cleaning devices for prevention and control of caries and periodontal disease

shutterstock_20598889-Floss

Thi Cochrane review evaluateingthe effectiveness of interdental cleaning devices used at home, in addition to toothbrushing, compared with toothbrushing alone, for preventing and controlling periodontal diseases, caries, and plaque includes 35 RCTs providing low to very low certainty evidence that floss or interdental brushes in addition to toothbrushing may reduce gingivitis or plaque, or both.

[read the full story...]

Interdental cleaning aids

Interdental_brush

This network meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy of interproximal oral hygiene aids included 22 RCTs and suggests that interdental brushes and water-jets ranked highest for the reduction of gingival bleeding. Although the quality of the available evidence is limited.

[read the full story...]

Which interdental cleaning aids for managing gingivitis?

shutterstock_129335495

A number of reviews have been conducted of interdental cleaning aids. This meta-review brings together 6 reviews and finds only evidence of low quality for interdental brushes, floss, woodsticks and oral irrigators.

[read the full story...]

Only low quality evidence available for effectiveness of interdental toothbrushes

shutterstock_129335495

Good oral hygiene to ensure the effective removal of dental plaque is key to maintaining good oral health.  While toothbrushing is the most commonly used method, dental floss and interdental brushes are both widely available and recommended adjuncts to toothbrushing.  A 2011 Cochrane review by Sambunjak et al assessed the evidence for dental floss (Dental [read the full story…]

Trail suggests that straight interdental brushes may be more effective than angled brushes

shutterstock_129335495

The effective removal of plaque is important for the prevention of both caries and periodontal disease. Interdental cleaning aids are frequently recommended in addition to toothbrushing to improve plaque removal.  The aim of this study was to investigate interproximal plaque removal with an angled interdental brush as compared to a straight interdental brush. Adults aged [read the full story…]